J Strom Thurmond
Hydro power plant · McCormick County, South Carolina
Details
- Primary fuel
- Hydro
- Technology
- Conventional Hydroelectric
- Operator
- USCE-Savannah District
- County
- McCormick County
- Generating units
- 7
- Share of state capacity
- 1.33%
- Rank among hydro plants in South Carolina
- #4 of 32
- EIA plant code
- 3323
Generating units
| Unit | Technology | Nameplate | Summer | Online | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conventional Hydroelectric | 52 MW | 48 MW | 1953 | Operating |
| 2 | Conventional Hydroelectric | 52 MW | 48 MW | 1953 | Operating |
| 3 | Conventional Hydroelectric | 52 MW | 48 MW | 1953 | Operating |
| 4 | Conventional Hydroelectric | 52 MW | 48 MW | 1953 | Operating |
| 5 | Conventional Hydroelectric | 52 MW | 48 MW | 1954 | Operating |
| 6 | Conventional Hydroelectric | 52 MW | 48 MW | 1954 | Operating |
| 7 | Conventional Hydroelectric | 52 MW | 48 MW | 1954 | Operating |
Nameplate is the maximum rated output; summer capacity is what the unit can reliably deliver on a hot day, which is typically lower.
Similarly sized plants in South Carolina
| Fairfield Pumped Storage | Hydro | 587 MW |
| Cope | Natural gas | 417 MW |
| Darlington County | Natural gas | 316 MW |
| McMeekin | Natural gas | 294 MW |
About this data
From EIA’s inventory of operable generators, May 2026 release. Capacity is nameplate — the maximum rated output of the equipment, not what the plant actually generates over a year, which depends on how often it runs. A 362 MW solar plant and a 362 MW nuclear plant have the same entry here and produce very different amounts of electricity.
“In service since” is the earliest in-service date among the units still listed, so a site rebuilt around newer equipment can read as younger than the site itself. All South Carolina power plants · What South Carolina actually generates