Nameplate capacity
9.0 MW
Rank in Michigan
#170
of 289 plants
In service since
2011
January 2011
Details
- Primary fuel
- Hydro
- Technology
- Conventional Hydroelectric
- Operator
- Consumers Energy Co - (MI)
- County
- Iosco County
- Generating units
- 3
- Share of state capacity
- 0.03%
- Rank among hydro plants in Michigan
- #11 of 51
- EIA plant code
- 1700
Generating units
| Unit | Technology | Nameplate | Summer | Online | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conventional Hydroelectric | 3.0 MW | 1.5 MW | 2011 | Operating |
| 2 | Conventional Hydroelectric | 3.0 MW | 2.9 MW | 2011 | Operating |
| 3 | Conventional Hydroelectric | 3.0 MW | 2.7 MW | 2011 | Operating |
Nameplate is the maximum rated output; summer capacity is what the unit can reliably deliver on a hot day, which is typically lower.
Similarly sized plants in Michigan
| Michigamme Falls | Hydro | 9.6 MW |
| Caro | Other | 9.4 MW |
| Foote | Hydro | 9.0 MW |
| Croton | Hydro | 8.9 MW |
About this data
From EIA’s inventory of operable generators, May 2026 release. Capacity is nameplate — the maximum rated output of the equipment, not what the plant actually generates over a year, which depends on how often it runs. A 9.0 MW solar plant and a 9.0 MW nuclear plant have the same entry here and produce very different amounts of electricity.
“In service since” is the earliest in-service date among the units still listed, so a site rebuilt around newer equipment can read as younger than the site itself. All Michigan power plants · What Michigan actually generates